In the fast-moving textile world, innovation and sustainability must go hand in hand. Yet, European companies are increasingly burdened by complex and unpredictable chemical legislation. That’s why the European textile and clothing industry, represented by EURATEX, has issued a strong and clear position paper on the upcoming revision of REACH — the EU’s flagship chemical regulation.
The challenge at hand
REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) is widely regarded as one of the most ambitious and complex chemical legislations in the world. While its aim — to protect human health and the environment — is supported by the industry, its implementation must not come at the cost of competitiveness or innovation.
EURATEX welcomes the Commission’s intention to simplify REACH, but urges that simplification must benefit companies just as much as it does authorities. Particularly for SMEs, who often struggle with the growing cost of compliance, a more predictable, coherent, and dialogue-driven framework is crucial.
To move forward in a constructive way, EURATEX presents six core recommendations to ensure REACH becomes not only more efficient, but also smarter, science-based, and industry-friendly.
1. Science first: prioritise risk-based approaches
A major concern lies in the shift toward generic hazard-based restrictions, which overlook how substances are actually used and whether they pose real-world risks. EURATEX strongly advocates for decisions based on scientific evidence and risk assessments, not just on hazard classifications.
Why does this matter? Because restricting substances without contextual risk can create unnecessary burdens, disrupt supply chains, and hinder R&D. The PFAS case — where even safe uses of certain substances are caught in a broad ban — illustrates this risk.
2. Better information exchange across the value chain
The textile industry relies heavily on chemical products provided by upstream suppliers. However, safety data sheets (SDS) — the primary tool for sharing chemical information — often lack detail, especially when substances are restricted but not classified.
EURATEX calls for a modernised, digital, and globally harmonised system for sharing chemical information, one that ensures full interoperability across the value chain. Clear, usable data is essential for effective compliance and communication.
3. Harmonised testing methods, updated with science
New restrictions are only effective if they are technically feasible to measure. Many chemicals used in the production process are not present in the finished textile — or are undetectable with current methods.
EURATEX stresses the need for validated and harmonised testing methods, with thresholds that are regularly updated in line with scientific progress. Without them, companies risk being penalised for unintentional traces — especially in recycled materials — further complicating circularity goals.
4. Avoid automatic restrictions through CLP
One of the most contested changes in the REACH revision is the proposed “dynamic link” between REACH and CLP (Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation). This would mean substances classified under CLP could be automatically restricted under REACH — without further dialogue, risk assessment, or stakeholder input.
EURATEX recommends a targeted and proportionate approach that avoids automatic triggers and instead evaluates the real impact and exposure of substances in their final form. A “smart-link,” not a dynamic one, is the way forward.
5. Give industry time to adapt to new obligations
Once a substance is labelled as a Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC), legal obligations for manufacturers and importers begin immediately — often without enough time to gather critical data from complex global supply chains.
EURATEX urges the Commission to introduce a one-year transition period for information obligations, and to publish updates to the Candidate List only once a year, on a fixed date. Predictability is key, especially for SMEs.
6. Ensure fair enforcement and a level playing field
Last but not least: if EU industry must meet high standards, so must non-EU competitors. Enforcement must be realistic, proportionate, and consistently applied across borders to avoid disadvantaging European producers — especially in recycling, where broad restrictions can cause unintended harm.
EURATEX calls for enforcement to be built into legislation from the start — considering not just what is ideal, but what is practical, measurable, and fair.
Why it matters for the textile sector
The REACH revision will shape the future of chemicals use in the EU — and with it, the future of textile production, design, and innovation. A smarter, more balanced framework has the potential to:
- Boost investment in sustainable alternatives
- Support circularity and recycling goals
- Strengthen the competitiveness of EU businesses
- Reduce unnecessary costs and legal uncertainty
Ellie.Connect will closely follow the REACH revision and keep the community informed about key developments and opportunities to engage.
Link to the Euratex’ Position Paper for the REACH revision : Red Copy of Position Paper REACH revision